These are interesting times in the outsourcing world, as typified by Peter Allen's post last week, where he mentions sporadic, stuttering growth as the leading Indian providers look to gain footholds in the market, and a slowdown in the number of mega-outsourcing deals being signed with the incumbent outsourcing behemoths. However, we have to look at the underlying drivers behind outsourcing to understand what is going on:
1) Large global enterprises are taking a gradual approach to outsourcing growth. Most of the FORTUNE 1000 enterprises have their own offshore captives and want to optimize what they have internally before moving more processes over to a third party provider. Whereas IT outsourcing is relatively mature, the approach of most global enterprises towards BPO is still cautious. Bottom-line, firms are still exploring which processes are appropriate for outsourcing, versus ones they should keep inhouse.
2) The service delivery landscape is still maturing. Whereas moving administrative processes like payroll, accounts payable, benefits admin, loans/claims processing is now a slam-dunk, the onus is moving towards companies sending out higher-value - and higher-cost - process to third-parties that require some degree of business insight, executive contact and critical-thinking. The financial business cases to outsource are normally very compelling when examined on a straight cost/employee basis, but the bigger issue is the capability of the outsourcing provider to take on these services, and the expertise of the buyer to execute an outsourcing transition successfully and design a retained infrastructure. While the value proposition is there, the service provider landscape is still in the phase of proving its capability do deliver. Remember, it took the ITO industry 20 years to get to a stage of relative maturity, and true BPO is barely a decade old.
3) The recent years of economic prosperity have eroded the urgency of many buyers. Each outsourcing "wave" has been driven by urgent financial needs of companies to curtail expenditure on SG&A. The waves of ITO deals in the early '90s, HRO and ITO deals after 9/11, were primarily driven by the need for buyers to experience a "quick fix" with their costs, combined with ambitious provider pricing designed to have immediate financial benefit to clients. The more recent wave of FAO deals has been driven by manufacturing, automotive and consumer businesses under serious competitive pressures. However, the relative economic comfort of recent years has allowed many enterprises to take more time over their sourcing decisions, and adopt a more "start-small" exploratory approach to understand what works for them. When you look at the anatomy of outsourcing expenditure over the last couple of years, we have seen a surge in smaller contracts that do not make the media radar. BPO is a complex business, so why should a company enter into huge multiple-process outsourcing engagements, when it can afford to take it's time a move out select functions on an incremental basis. However, as we stare hard at the prospect of an economic downturn in 2008, will we see companies step up their urgency to cut costs? Is the maturing provider landscape ready to take on a new wave of more complex services?
History has so far proven that outsourcing has been aggressively driven by companies in financial distress during economic downturns. This time, we may be about to witness the coming together of enterprise needs and service provider delivery capability. Have your say and vote on the poll to the left sidebar.
Is the outsourcing industry primed to grow in a downturn? Have your say and vote...
Hi Phil,
Well, there was an article in the Wall Street Journal back around 1992-94 timeframe entitled, "Why Outsourcing Loves a Recession". However, based on the lackluster year of 2007 that I saw in the market, one would have to wonder.
All the best,
Thom
Posted by: Thom Mead | Jan 08, 2008 at 12:47 PM
The key question is: can India supply the extra demand? I believe that regions like LATAM willl be playing more critical roles going forward. Thanks, Humberto
Posted by: Humberto Andrade | Dec 05, 2007 at 03:27 PM
A downturn should make business leaders sit up and re-evaluate core competencies. This could mean selling off under performing business units & utilising third parties to drive down costs.
Also - during a stable economy, if buyers have been "taking their time" selectively outsourcing small pieces of their operations -then during a downturn, (especailly if they have had good a positive experience of outsourcing)- they may have a bigger appetite to outsource
Posted by: Steve Dunkerley | Dec 05, 2007 at 01:50 PM
Phil,
Over the past several weeks various comments relative to this topic have been discussed and published as we approach 2008. Below are some comments as well as my perspective
“The expectation is that outsourcing in the financial services industry will grow as buyers seek to reduce operating costs, avoid investments into new systems and capabilities, shift focus to more strategic activities, and leverage their growing supply of skilled global resources,” said Stan Lepeak, EquaTerra’s Managing Director of Research. “This trend in financial services illustrates that outsourcing as an industry has become ‘recession-proof’ and that outsourcing is a tool buyers use in up markets to improve performance and in down markets to reduce costs and remain competitive.”
IDC Research also predicts that F&A outsourcing will increase. According to their recent research, IDC estimates that U.S. spending on F&A BPO services amounted to $9.4 billion in 2006 and expects this market to grow to $19.4 billion by 2011, a five-year CAGR of 15.6%. Source: IDC, “Worldwide and U.S. Business Process Outsourcing 2007-2011 Forecast: Market Opportunities by Horizontal Business Process,” Doc # 208290, September 2007.
Based on feedback from clients, partners and industry experts, the following specific trends are emerging:
· The Return of Risk
Before the credit turmoil, a combination of low interest rates, plentiful liquidity, a strong economy, and a hot real estate market made investors less risk adverse and therefore made funding easily available to issuers, including speculative-grade companies. However, with the credit squeeze in full swing, expect to see a tightening in the credit management function and a push for more scrutiny over credit worthiness across all industries.
·
Cash Flow Optimization and the Coming of the Financial Supply Chain
Especially with today’s credit market fears, cash is once again king. To that end, CFOs will put additional emphasis on making sure their financial supply chain and therefore their cash flow is optimized to ensure they are able to ride out the anticipated tough economy.
· Growing Pressure to Shake up the Entire Accounting Process
From the move to fair-value accounting, which could affect everything from hedging strategies to emissions credits, and a push to overhaul financial statements to make them better reflect corporate performance, the industry as whole is about transparency and efficiency around financial processes. Above and beyond government regulated changes, CFOs will be taking extra measures to mitigate risk, which will likely result in additional documentation, disclosures and in general more business processes.
Posted by: Robert Sherman | Dec 04, 2007 at 06:58 PM
Steve/Travis,
Outsourcing is one way to reduce staff headcount quickly without incurring major resourcing headaches. Many firms have already done a lot of work evaluating how they can leverage third-party providers to take on business process and IT work, and moves to reduce headcount may drive them to consider outsourcing options, if the other alternative is going to be straight headcount reduction. The recent weakening of the dollar has reduced the financial business case from a cost-saving perspective for some firms, but the move towards volume-based pricing, as opposed to straight FTE "job-shifting" pricing, is helping to circumvent this.
PF
Posted by: Phil Fersht | Dec 04, 2007 at 12:35 PM
I don't think it will. My reason being that during times of economic thrift companies will likely contract. Accordingly, I think layoffs would supplant outsourcing inclinations.
Steve.
Posted by: S.J. Crocker | Dec 04, 2007 at 09:36 AM
Hi Phil,
More likely the downturn in the US will spark protectionism there I think.
Posted by: Travis Darrow | Dec 03, 2007 at 10:10 PM
Phil,
I believe there are a number of factors that will play into whether that will actually be the case. First off, while the providers can add more business the question is whether they can add business with the amount of margin needed to offset their infrastructure growth. Second, the provider needs to be prepared to service industries it has previously avoided or have not made a priority. To get there they will need to be more knowledgable and have more tools to make sure they can do the job efficiently. They will tell the client they can handle anything but as you know that is not the case in many situations. Many more issues come up depending upon who the client ends up being...
David
Posted by: David Sheinfeld | Dec 03, 2007 at 08:55 AM